Comparison between awaqua vs existing STP/ETP process
- Home
- Comparison between awaqua vs existing STP/ETP process
Comparison between awaqua vs existing STP/ETP process
| AWAQUA - AQUA TECH STP/ETP PROCESS | BLOWER TYPE METHOD STP/ETP |
|---|---|
|
VERY SMALL SPACE IS ENOUGH (10/10) |
HUGE SPACE IS ESSENTIAL |
|
NO BLOWER AT ALL |
BLOWER IS MUST TO RUN THE PLANT |
|
SLUDGE WILL BE CONTROLLED FULLY IN THE BEGINNING |
SLUDGE WILL BE A CONTINUOUS BURDEN |
|
LESS MAN POWER
|
NEED SUFFICIENT MAN POWER
|
|
FASTEST REACTION IN FRACTION OF MINUTES
|
VERY LONG PROCESS TIME |
|
FASTEST REACTION IN FRACTION OF MINUTES
|
NEARLY 40-60% ONLY |
|
REDUCE 70% COST OF DM WATER PURCHASE IN INDUSTRIES |
CAN NOT BE USED AS DM WATER |
|
VERY LOW POWER CONSUMPTION
|
MERELY HIGH POWER CONSUMPTION |
|
3000 LPH TO 60000 LPH CAN BE DONE IN 15/15 SPACE
|
NEED MORE SPACE WHEN QUANTITY INCREASE |
|
MINIMUM TWO YEARS - NO MAINTENANCE COST |
CHARGES APPLICABLE FROM THE DAY FIRST |
|
70-80% SLUDGE REDUCTION |
HEAVY SLUDGE FORMATION & IS A HEADACHE |
|
44-95% TDS CAN BE REDUCED |
TDS ONLY CAN BE REDUCED THRU R.O.
|
|
MICROBIAL DISINFECTION DONE IN THE SAME PROCESS |
CAN NOT BE DONE IN THE SAME PROCESS |
|
ASSURED CRYSTAL CLEAR WATER OUTPUT |
40 - 60% TURBID WATER |
|
USED FOR PLANTATION, WASHING, FLESHOUTS ETC |
DIFFICULT IN SOME AREA OF APPLICATION
|
|
LOW CHEMICAL CONSUMPTION COST |
DOUBLE or TRIPLE THE CONSUMPTION |
|
DESTRUCTION OF EFFLUENT IS WATER, CO2 & SALTS |
DESTRUCTION TAKES PLACE ONLY 40-50% |
|
NOISELESS PROCESS |
HEAVY BLOWER SOUND/SMELL |
|
ANYONE CAN OPERATE |
TRAINED PEOPLE ONLY CAN OPERATE |
|
SIMPLE ON/OFF SYSTEM |
USING MULTIPLE PROCESS SYSTEM |
|
ANY TYPE OF EFFLUENT CAN BE TREATED |
ONLY STP CAN BE TREATED PARTIALLY
|
|
HIGHLY COST EFFECTIVE |
HUGE INVESTMENT |